This went out in the mail a few weeks ago but still seemed worth mentioning. For reporting on this issue, see Robert McCartney's article in the Washington Post. For an alternative point of view, see the anti-union and pro-Ervin editorial in the Washington Post. Ironically, the editorial's use of terms such as "union bosses" undercuts their own complaint about the "tenor of public comments" made by union leaders.
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Unions Attack Valerie Ervin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
The WaPo's contempt for unions is almost as pronounced as its admiration for going to war.
Yeah, one of the best ways to conclusively demonstrate one's ignorance is to refer to the Post as a liberal paper.
Post a Comment